Ivan.Galv писал(а): ↑16 ноя 2020, 18:01
. Консерваторы не против иммиграции в Канаде. Цели слегка поумереннее, но никакой серьезной разницы для планов иммиграции akick это не делает.
Ага, конечно, если уменьшатся цели, и останется такой же спрос, то akick будет очень сложно набрать проходной бал. То есть сейчас бы он уже скорее всего просто не прошел, а если бы выборки еще проходили раз в месяц, чтобы сократить набор людей, то тогда бал бы еще больше взлетел.
Отправлено спустя 1 минуту 38 секунд:
Ivan.Galv писал(а): ↑16 ноя 2020, 18:01
3. Трамп мог себе позволить быть более сильным протекционистом чем в Канаде, ибо Age pyramid у США более healthy и нет такой наркоманской зависимости от иммигрантов в исправлении ее, еак в Канаде. Имея бешеный торговый дефицит с Китаем, как минимум по-детски пытаться представить ситуацию с одной стороны и проигнорировать вторую.
Ну, вот в самой консервативной провинции вот так вот говорит премьер:
“It is extremely difficult for me to justify employers looking outside Alberta, to bring people into the labour market in the midst of an unprecedented crisis,” Kenney said at the time.
The province will also reduce the number of certificates it hands out in a year through the Alberta Immigrant Nominee Program, from 6,250 permanent resident nominations this year to no more than 4,000.
Kenney said that’s in part because travel restrictions due to COVID-19 are keeping people from coming to Alberta and also because of the weakened state of the economy when they arrive.
“The data and research is very clear that newcomers who arrive in the midst of a serious recession do much less well throughout their entire lives in Canada than those who arrive during periods of economic growth,” he said.
“So I don’t think we would be doing anybody a favour to bring them into an incredibly tough labour market.”
Отправлено спустя 3 минуты 58 секунд:
maksashdod писал(а): ↑16 ноя 2020, 18:19
Ага, потрудитесь посмотреть первые 1.5 минуты
Вот, Джо Байден нормальный кандидат, он опубликовал свои налоговые декларации, почему интересно Трамп так не может сделать? Будучи, единственным кандидатом, который не опубликовал свои налоговые декларации.
Trump et al. are wrong: Biden Cancer Initiative is not to be confused with the Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot
By Matthew Bin Han Ong
On Nov. 15, shortly after midnight, President Donald J. Trump tweeted a link to a New York Post headline:
“Tax filings reveal Biden cancer charity spent millions on salaries, zero on research”
Waking up later that morning, Fox News host Laura Ingraham and former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, gleefully lent their voices to the now-familiar cacophony of disinformation. A day later, Fox News host Sean Hannity joined their chorus.
For those just tuning in, the president was retweeting a story about the Biden Cancer Initiative, a small organization that is not to be confused with the Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot, a bipartisan effort to increase funding for cancer research.
The Moonshot demonstrates Biden’s deep understanding of cancer and defines Biden’s legacy in the Obama administration (The Cancer Letter, Nov. 13, 2020). The Post story and the subsequent brouhaha are noteworthy because of their failure to distinguish between the Biden Moonshot and a small nonprofit that was never intended to fund research. Creating confusion—conflating—seems to be the point.
Let’s untangle this knot:
The Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot is a government program resulting from an unprecedented bipartisan effort to double the rate of progress in cancer research. In 2016, then Vice President Joe Biden’s leadership and steadfast congressional support for biomedical research culminated in the Moonshot legislation, which authorized $1.8 billion over seven years for cancer research (The Cancer Letter, Dec. 16, 2016).
The Biden Cancer Initiative, the object of coverage here, was a short-lived cancer nonprofit that was launched in New York on June 26, 2017, in the afterglow of the Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot of 2016 (The Cancer Letter, June 30, 2017). The organization ran for two years, suspending operations during the Biden presidential run.
The New York Post is factually correct on one point: The Biden Cancer Initiative funded no research. That’s because, again, it was never intended to.
...
Trump is in no position to gloat on the subject of charities, including those dealing with cancer.
In November 2019, a New York state judge ordered Trump to pay a $2 million judgment for improperly using his Trump Foundation charity to further his 2016 presidential campaign.
In a controversy involving donations for pediatric cancer, Forbes published a report in 2017 stating that, based on filings from the Eric Trump Foundation and other charities, more than $1.2 million “has no documented recipients past the Trump Organization.”
Copyright (c) 2020 The Cancer Letter Inc.
https://cancerletter.com/articles/20201116_1/
